Re: Missing cases from SPI_result_code_string()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing cases from SPI_result_code_string()
Date: 2023-02-20 19:39:59
Message-ID: 3638945.1676921999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Another one noticed from the MERGE RETURNING patch -- the switch
> statement in SPI_result_code_string() is missing cases for
> SPI_OK_TD_REGISTER and SPI_OK_MERGE.

Ugh. Grepping around, it looks like pltcl_process_SPI_result
is missing a case for SPI_OK_MERGE as well.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-02-20 19:41:52 Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-02-20 19:39:01 Re: meson: Non-feature feature options