Re: snapper and skink and fairywren (oh my!)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapper and skink and fairywren (oh my!)
Date: 2022-01-27 14:59:07
Message-ID: fc2cddee-aa3c-e84b-c131-5c30dab641c6@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 1/26/22 18:45, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 1/26/22 16:17, Robert Haas wrote
>> 3. fairywren failed the last run in module-commit_tsCheck. It's unhappy because:
>>
> Intermittent failures give a false positive against the latest set of
> commits. These failures started happening regularly about 49 days ago.
> So we need to look at what exactly happened around then. See
> <https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_failures.pl?max_days=90&stage=module-commit_tsCheck&filter=Submit>

Specifically, the issue is discussed here
<https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BOeoETZQ%3DQw5Ub5h3tmwQhBmDA%3DnuNO3KG%3DzWfUypFAw%40mail.gmail.com>
Tom has already reverted the offending changes on the back branches.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-01-27 15:07:37 Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message
Previous Message Ronan Dunklau 2022-01-27 13:58:37 Re: Proposal: More structured logging