From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
Date: | 2022-01-27 15:07:37 |
Message-ID: | CALj2ACUfLrN8XGn0ZNrAou5eoDwMnFGnDE9rhcs8==jmtSd4WA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:06 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 1/3/22, 5:52 PM, "Kyotaro Horiguchi" <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > It seems to me "LSN" or just "location" is more confusing or
> > mysterious than "REDO LSN" for the average user. If we want to avoid
> > being technically too detailed, we would use just "start LSN=%X/%X,
> > end LSN=%X/%X". And it is equivalent to "WAL range=[%X/%X, %X/%X]"..
>
> My first instinct was that this should stay aligned with
> pg_controldata, but that would mean using "location=%X/%X, REDO
> location=%X/%X," which doesn't seem terribly descriptive. IIUC the
> "checkpoint location" is the LSN of the WAL record for the checkpoint,
> and the "checkpoint's REDO location" is the LSN where checkpoint
> creation began (i.e., what you must retain for crash recovery). My
> vote is for "start=%X/%X, end=%X/%X."
I'm still not clear how the REDO location can be treated as a start
LSN? Can someone throw some light one what this checkpoint's REDO
location is?
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-01-27 15:15:27 | Re: support for MERGE |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-01-27 14:59:07 | Re: snapper and skink and fairywren (oh my!) |