| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, dinesh salve <cooltodinesh(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: explain plans for foreign servers |
| Date: | 2025-03-05 23:24:31 |
| Message-ID: | fc0cd0a77a2a5566f30a630580affb9fc3f43ce7.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 14:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm afraid not. That pretty fundamentally breaks the wire protocol,
> I think.
The extended protocol docs say: "The possible responses to Execute are
the same as those described above for queries issued via simple query
protocol, except that Execute doesn't cause ReadyForQuery or
RowDescription to be issued."
Each result set needs a RowDescription, so I think you're right that it
breaks the extended protocol. I missed that the first time.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-03-05 23:25:39 | Re: [PATCH] Add regression tests of ecpg command notice (error / warning) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-03-05 23:10:41 | Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect |