Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
Date: 2025-03-05 23:10:41
Message-ID: 489605.1741216241@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> yeah makes sense. Done in the attached, and bonus point I realized that the
> test could be simplified (so, removing useless steps in passing).

Just a side note: tayra showed two instances of this failure today
[1][2]. That's not using valgrind. I wonder if we changed something
else recently that would make this more probable?

regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2021%3A36%3A40
[2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2013%3A42%3A17

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-05 23:24:31 Re: explain plans for foreign servers
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-03-05 22:56:42 Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes