Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt

From: Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga(dot)katayama(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
Date: 2020-09-16 09:58:58
Message-ID: fb4c71e7-ec00-243e-2a70-1b5af51519f6@toshiba.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thank you for your comment.

Please let me know if anyone has any other comments.

Regards,
Taiga Katayama

On 2020/09/10 21:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 10 Sep 2020, at 07:54, Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga(dot)katayama(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>> We hope to be incorporated this extension into PostgreSQL as one of
>> contrib module, and would like to try to propose to Commit Fest.
>> Could you kindly advise me and share your opinion?
>
> FWIW I would like to see fewer modules in contrib rather than gaining more, and
> (I can't stress this enough) that's not in any way a comment on the quality or
> the usefulness of the extension in question here.
>
> The outside-of-core ecosystem for postgres extensions has been discussed in
> various threads lately, and improving that seems a more sustainable solution
> than bundling more. That's no doubt a lot easier said than done, but I think
> it's extremely important for the community.
>
> cheers ./daniel
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tharakan, Robins 2020-09-16 10:55:04 RE: track_planning causing performance regression
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-09-16 09:37:03 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting