| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | taiga(dot)katayama(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt |
| Date: | 2020-09-10 12:09:11 |
| Message-ID: | E91A8B08-1CA1-41B0-9886-D2FE1ECA25A7@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 10 Sep 2020, at 07:54, Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga(dot)katayama(at)toshiba(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> We hope to be incorporated this extension into PostgreSQL as one of
> contrib module, and would like to try to propose to Commit Fest.
> Could you kindly advise me and share your opinion?
FWIW I would like to see fewer modules in contrib rather than gaining more, and
(I can't stress this enough) that's not in any way a comment on the quality or
the usefulness of the extension in question here.
The outside-of-core ecosystem for postgres extensions has been discussed in
various threads lately, and improving that seems a more sustainable solution
than bundling more. That's no doubt a lot easier said than done, but I think
it's extremely important for the community.
cheers ./daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kasahara Tatsuhito | 2020-09-10 12:11:21 | Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-09-10 12:04:05 | Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) |