Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?
Date: 2003-07-16 13:24:23
Message-ID: fb118f906e48a6551129423b40689160@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> - allows us to say that PostgreSQL ships with field-tested
> replication in the source tree

We have a winner! I think this one trumps all the rest.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200307160920

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE/FVGlvJuQZxSWSsgRAhvZAJ0fqYZctnt45zTAqbL7dLajOfewGQCeKaUq
9VJkugleaEukmFsbwabNyO8=
=wIZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-07-16 13:38:17 Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2003-07-16 12:23:21 Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?