From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg? |
Date: | 2003-07-16 13:38:17 |
Message-ID: | 20030716133817.GE30137@libertyrms.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:23:21PM +0200, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > pro contrib/:
>
> You have four pro arguments, two of which are for marketing and the
> other two are for lazyness :-)
For what it's worth, I don't think the marketing arguments are
nothing. That view was confirmed by what I heard at the OSCON BOF.
> Maybe a wish for some official mention of this - and other important - gborg
> project in the documentation ?
That's not a bad idea, actually. The projects on gborg suffer from
too little publicity. I knew nothing about the very cool PL/R until
I heard about it directly from Joe.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-07-16 14:02:28 | Re: FROM clause omitted |
Previous Message | greg | 2003-07-16 13:24:23 | Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg? |