Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?
Date: 2003-07-16 13:38:17
Message-ID: 20030716133817.GE30137@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 02:23:21PM +0200, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > pro contrib/:
>
> You have four pro arguments, two of which are for marketing and the
> other two are for lazyness :-)

For what it's worth, I don't think the marketing arguments are
nothing. That view was confirmed by what I heard at the OSCON BOF.

> Maybe a wish for some official mention of this - and other important - gborg
> project in the documentation ?

That's not a bad idea, actually. The projects on gborg suffer from
too little publicity. I knew nothing about the very cool PL/R until
I heard about it directly from Joe.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-16 14:02:28 Re: FROM clause omitted
Previous Message greg 2003-07-16 13:24:23 Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?