Re: Hijack!

From: Lew <lew(at)lwsc(dot)ehost-services(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hijack!
Date: 2007-12-13 07:51:12
Message-ID: fJWdne3d7q_tef3anZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d@comcast.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Trevor Talbot wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Now, a gripe rightly attributable to the to PG mailing list setup is
>> that every time I reply, I have to:
>>
>> (1) use reply all, because reply is set to go to the individual rather
>> than the list
>>
>> (2) delete all the individual addressees so only the list is left, then
>> change that from CC to TO
>
> Actually, another convention on this list is to "reply all" and leave
> the individual addresses.

I'm really glad that people don't do that on this list. I /hate/ getting
individual email copies from list posters. I'm going to read it on the list;
why in the world would I want that clutter in my inbox?

That's why my email address here is a separate one just for Usenet; I can
pretty much ignore replies that come directly to it.

--
Lew

In response to

  • Re: Hijack! at 2007-12-12 06:41:14 from Trevor Talbot

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D. Dante Lorenso 2007-12-13 08:14:40 Re: Need LIMIT and ORDER BY for UPDATE
Previous Message Lew 2007-12-13 07:47:03 Re: Hijack!