From: | Lew <lew(at)lwsc(dot)ehost-services(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hijack! |
Date: | 2007-12-13 07:51:12 |
Message-ID: | fJWdne3d7q_tef3anZ2dnUVZ_t7inZ2d@comcast.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Trevor Talbot wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Now, a gripe rightly attributable to the to PG mailing list setup is
>> that every time I reply, I have to:
>>
>> (1) use reply all, because reply is set to go to the individual rather
>> than the list
>>
>> (2) delete all the individual addressees so only the list is left, then
>> change that from CC to TO
>
> Actually, another convention on this list is to "reply all" and leave
> the individual addresses.
I'm really glad that people don't do that on this list. I /hate/ getting
individual email copies from list posters. I'm going to read it on the list;
why in the world would I want that clutter in my inbox?
That's why my email address here is a separate one just for Usenet; I can
pretty much ignore replies that come directly to it.
--
Lew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | D. Dante Lorenso | 2007-12-13 08:14:40 | Re: Need LIMIT and ORDER BY for UPDATE |
Previous Message | Lew | 2007-12-13 07:47:03 | Re: Hijack! |