Re: Hijack!

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Lew <lew(at)lwsc(dot)ehost-services(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hijack!
Date: 2007-12-14 16:55:04
Message-ID: 20071214165504.GD6269@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Lew wrote:
> Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> On 12/11/07, Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Now, a gripe rightly attributable to the to PG mailing list setup is
>>> that every time I reply, I have to:
>>>
>>> (1) use reply all, because reply is set to go to the individual rather
>>> than the list
>>>
>>> (2) delete all the individual addressees so only the list is left, then
>>> change that from CC to TO
>>
>> Actually, another convention on this list is to "reply all" and leave
>> the individual addresses.
>
> I'm really glad that people don't do that on this list. I /hate/ getting
> individual email copies from list posters. I'm going to read it on the
> list; why in the world would I want that clutter in my inbox?

Huh, you know you can de-duplicate them at your end, right? Actually I
prefer to get the private copy, so that I get the email immediately even
if the list server is down or slow.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/CTMLCN8V17R4
"Ninguna manada de bestias tiene una voz tan horrible como la humana" (Orual)

In response to

Responses

  • Re: Hijack! at 2007-12-14 21:38:48 from Martijn van Oosterhout

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas McNaught 2007-12-14 17:05:20 Re: Finding bad bye in "invalid byte sequence" error
Previous Message Thomas Hart 2007-12-14 16:53:59 Re: Hijack!