From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE |
Date: | 2017-01-03 15:48:42 |
Message-ID: | f8c4c3c4-5afa-38bd-02f3-b20378b4faa2@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/30/16 9:28 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> The attached patch is reworked from a previous one [1] to better deal
> with get_object_address and pg_get_object_address.
>
> Regards,
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150317171836.GC10492@momjian.us
The syntax we have used for the user/role case is ALTER USER
CURRENT_USER, not ALTER CURRENT USER, so this should be done in the same
way for databases. Eventually, we'll also want ALTER DATABASE
current_database, and probably not ALTER CURRENT DATABASE, etc.
It's also curious that we don't support COMMENT on whatever CURRENT_USER
yet. It looks like the previous patch to allow ALTER USER CURRENT_USER
etc. was not even applied to pg_dump.
I think this patch is a good direction to move in, and it seems everyone
else agreed, but I'm looking for a bit more of a holistic solution than
one command at a time here and there. Define a goal such as, allow
restoring into a differently-named database, and then see what needs to
happen to achieve that.
The implementation looks generally OK, but I'm not sure why you need
this part:
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
index bb4b080..71bffae 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c
@@ -621,6 +621,9 @@ static const struct object_type_map
{
"database", OBJECT_DATABASE
},
+ {
+ "current database", OBJECT_DATABASE
+ },
/* OCLASS_TBLSPACE */
{
"tablespace", OBJECT_TABLESPACE
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-03 15:50:54 | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-03 15:48:37 | Re: An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE |