Re: An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE
Date: 2017-01-03 15:48:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZHd8N2wto==EXovoTjZ6rStZ5TPmwbtGErw2dU7=52kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> To be able to do this, the patch modifies the isolation tester so that
> it recognises wait_event SafeSnapshot.

I'm not going to say that's unacceptable, but it's certainly not beautiful.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-03 15:48:42 Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-03 15:45:07 Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP