Re: purple letters

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: "pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: purple letters
Date: 2017-09-25 20:53:10
Message-ID: f879c107-b60a-23ae-ba99-f95c738c02a0@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

For my part, when I designed my programming language, I intentionally did not
use single-letter names for any keywords or reserved words or system-defined
entities etc, and all built-ins were either 2+ letters or were symbols. As a
result, single-letter names are available/reserved for end users as barewords to
name their own (presumably narrow-lexical-scope) stuff, without having to guess
which letters they may use. -- Darren Duncan

On 2017-09-22 8:05 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
> The characters which are in purple colour are are valid SQL keywords hence
> highlighted by CodeMirror :-)
> Ref: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Hibbard, Brandon
> wrote:
>
> I have a quick question on the code highlighting. I often use a single
> character as an alias for tables in joins. I have noticed that some
> letters are colored purple while others are black. Is there a reason
> for this? I have attached an image showing what I mean. The image was
> taken from version 2.0-rc2.

In response to

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Siddharth Divi 2017-09-26 01:26:09 Inability to export data as '.csv' file in pgAdmin4
Previous Message Hibbard, Brandon 2017-09-25 17:07:52 RE: purple letters