Re: [pgsql-www] Argentina PUG

+1 on ISO 3166-2

gb.-

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Selena Deckelmann
<selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Emanuel CALVO FRANCO
> <postgres(dot)arg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> From here on out, non-country pugs will have to have at least 3
>>> characters in their abbreviation!
>>>
>>
>> so, will be rename ArgPug?
>
> If we follow ISO 3166-2, it would be 'arpug'.
>
>>> I'll handle the issue with BWPUG (ISO 3166-2 assigns BW to Botswana),
>>> if/when it comes up.
>>>
>>> I still like having the messy naming for the rest of the groups.
>>> There's no one standard that's going to address regional, state,
>>> province and municipality all at once.
>>>
>>
>> It's a hard work... i think every country must have a general pug,
>> then each must allow local groups.
>
> It's not necessary to have a PUG for every country.
>
> We are just going to reserve the two-letter prefixes for country codes
> from now on.
>
> We will continue to have language-specific lists, which are not
> exclusive to a single country.
>
> -selena
>
> --
> Selena Deckelmann
> PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
> Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
> --
> TIP 10: no uses HTML en tu pregunta, seguro que quien responda no podrá leerlo
>