Re: Vacuum doesn't end

Usually, on this situations, you've got a deadlock or alike.

What I do is to trace the pid of the vacuum (strace -p pid) and try to guess
if the vacuum
is working or expecting some semaphore to get green (that would be a problem
on the db side).

If this is the problem, a quick look into the procs running in the
pg_Stat_activity table will give
you an idea of the situation. Prolly, nothing was going on when you started
your vacuum
but somehow, a proc acquired a lock somewhere and the vacuum reached that
somewhere causing
somekinda wait.

At least, this is very often in my scenery, using 7.4.3 and linux also.

Regards,
Guido

On 8/3/05, Scott Barvick <sbarvick(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> I have an application that may add a couple million rows per day so I
> vacuum nightly. The tables never get to more than about 10 million rows
> before I move off the interesting information to other media. Somewhat
> often, my vacuums don't complete as shown from this ps command (usually
> VACUUMs take a couple minutes)
>
> 4442 ? R 949:07 postgres: postgres tag 127.0.0.1(33420) VACUUM
>
> and the CPU for postmaster (hyperthreaded linux) will be in the high
> 90s.
>
> The locks look like:
> scouts=# select * from pg_locks;
> relation | database | transaction | pid | mode |
> granted
>
> ----------+----------+-------------+-------+--------------------------+---------
> | | 12826125 | 11642 | ExclusiveLock |
> t
> 16839 | 17230 | | 11642 | AccessShareLock |
> t
> 17251 | 17230 | | 4442 | RowExclusiveLock |
> t
> 17251 | 17230 | | 4442 | ShareUpdateExclusiveLock |
> t
> 17246 | 17230 | | 4442 | ShareUpdateExclusiveLock |
> t
> 17246 | 17230 | | 4442 | ShareUpdateExclusiveLock |
> t
> | | 12817402 | 4442 | ExclusiveLock |
> t
> (7 rows)
>
>
> I all inserts and maintenance through JDBC and may have inserts going on
> while a different java thread calls the VACUUM command.
>
> Any thoughts? Can I recover without dropping the server?
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
"Adopting the position that you are smarter than an automatic
optimization algorithm is generally a good way to achieve less
performance, not more" - Tom Lane.