Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Jeremy Schneider <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-03 16:50:12
Message-ID: f780b8bc-a278-1e1f-f274-a9dbf1ab8912@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On 6/2/20 1:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> No, nothing does as PG doesn't support it as we have one WAL stream for
>> the entire cluster.

On 6/2/20 11:38, Ron wrote:
> Right.  Making WAL files specific to a database should be high on the
> list of priorities.

Did Oracle change this? Last time I looked, I don't think Oracle
supported local redo in their multitenant architecture either.

-Jeremy

--
Jeremy Schneider
Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2020-06-03 17:45:43 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-06-03 15:09:59 Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?