| From: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
| Date: | 2020-06-03 17:45:43 |
| Message-ID: | VisenaEmail.34.343197b56a69f614.1727b47575a@tc7-visena |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
På onsdag 03. juni 2020 kl. 18:50:12, skrev Jeremy Schneider <
schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com <mailto:schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com>>:
> On 6/2/20 1:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> No, nothing does as PG doesn't support it as we have one WAL stream for
>> the entire cluster.
On 6/2/20 11:38, Ron wrote:
> Right. Making WAL files specific to a database should be high on the
> list of priorities.
Did Oracle change this? Last time I looked, I don't think Oracle
supported local redo in their multitenant architecture either.
Regardless of what Oracle does, I agree this would be a huge step in the right
direction for pg-DBAs.
I have absolutely no clue about how much work is required etc., but I think
it's kind of strange that no companies have invested in making this happen.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sonam Sharma | 2020-06-03 17:57:36 | Re: Shared memory error |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Schneider | 2020-06-03 16:50:12 | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |