| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tid scan improvements |
| Date: | 2021-06-07 19:38:20 |
| Message-ID: | f4accbba-15db-4a21-175b-947317d13acd@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07.06.21 13:50, David Rowley wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 23:46, Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch didn't add _outTidRangePath() even though we have outNode()
>>> coverage for most/all path nodes. Was this just forgotten? See
>>> attached patch.
>>
>>
>> Yes, it looks like an omission. Thanks for spotting it. Patch looks good to me.
>
> Yeah. That was forgotten. Patch also looks fine to me. Do you want
> to push it, Peter?
done
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-06-07 19:49:59 | Re: SQL-standard function body |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-07 19:24:33 | Re: SQL-standard function body |