| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tid scan improvements |
| Date: | 2021-06-07 11:50:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvqqqHk_rZgtHUv_AJgrt5WFLZk=1gO--8gmRAQbrNWDGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 23:46, Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 22:11, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch didn't add _outTidRangePath() even though we have outNode()
>> coverage for most/all path nodes. Was this just forgotten? See
>> attached patch.
>
>
> Yes, it looks like an omission. Thanks for spotting it. Patch looks good to me.
Yeah. That was forgotten. Patch also looks fine to me. Do you want
to push it, Peter?
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-06-07 12:11:35 | Re: contrib/pg_visibility fails regression under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |
| Previous Message | Edmund Horner | 2021-06-07 11:46:26 | Re: Tid scan improvements |