Re: Cygwin support

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin support
Date: 2025-04-22 14:54:46
Message-ID: f4415fb7-7855-4bb6-817c-c0f230e550cb@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-04-22 Tu 10:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I agree that I would not normally use Cygwin to run a Postgres instance.
>> But its psql is nicer than others on Windows because unlike the native
>> builds we build it with readline. That's why I've kept a buildfarm
>> animal going all these years. If the maintenance burden were high I
>> wouldn't do so - but it's not really. And these patches are tiny.
> I vaguely recall some discussion about whether building with readline
> has become possible under MSVC. I think it'd make a lot of people
> happy if that could happen (but I hasten to add that I'm not
> volunteering).
>
>

Neither am I, although I'll test it if somebody sends in a patch. If
that happens I'll be happy enough to retire Cygwin support.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Borisov 2025-04-22 14:56:50 Re: Fortify float4 and float8 regression tests by ordering test results
Previous Message Robin Haberkorn 2025-04-22 14:51:01 Re: [PATCH] contrib/xml2: xslt_process() should report XSLT-related error details