Re: Cygwin support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cygwin support
Date: 2025-04-22 14:26:15
Message-ID: 971005.1745331975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I agree that I would not normally use Cygwin to run a Postgres instance.
> But its psql is nicer than others on Windows because unlike the native
> builds we build it with readline. That's why I've kept a buildfarm
> animal going all these years. If the maintenance burden were high I
> wouldn't do so - but it's not really. And these patches are tiny.

I vaguely recall some discussion about whether building with readline
has become possible under MSVC. I think it'd make a lot of people
happy if that could happen (but I hasten to add that I'm not
volunteering).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2025-04-22 14:34:55 Re: Correct documentation for protocol version
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-04-22 14:23:28 Re: Fortify float4 and float8 regression tests by ordering test results