Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Nicola Contu <nicola(dot)contu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7
Date: 2017-12-04 16:44:49
Message-ID: f249b1c3-a561-d5b5-1e6a-2c5d826f1451@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/04/2017 04:57 PM, Nicola Contu wrote:
> No I did not run a vacuum analyze. Do you want me to try with that first?
>
> @Tomas:
> Talking abut power management, I changed the profile for tuned-adm
> to latency-performance instead of balanced (that is the default)
>
> that is increasing performances for now and they are similar to centos 6.9.
>
> Time: 2.121 ms
> Time: 2.026 ms
> Time: 1.664 ms
> Time: 1.749 ms
> Time: 1.656 ms
> Time: 1.675 ms
>
> Do you think this can be easily done in production as well? 
>

How am I supposed to know? Not only that depends on your internal
deployment policies, but it's also much more a CentOS/RedHat question
than PostgreSQL.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Day, David 2017-12-04 18:15:14 RE: attempting to retrieve column names from information schema fails.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-04 16:08:15 Re: attempting to retrieve column names from information schema fails.