Re: Performance with temporary table

Hi
The reason for using the temporary table is that i need this data
buffered somewhere so that i can use it for later computation. And the
fact that for each imputation i need to have historical data from 10
previous weeks makes it necessary to create something that can hold
the data. However once the computation is done for each record i
wouldn't need that historical data for that record. I Would be moving
on to the next record and find its own historical data.
Is there any way i can avoid using temp table?

Samantha

On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > samantha mahindrakar escribió:
> >
> > > Well instead of creating a temp table everytime i just created a
> > > permanant table and insert the data into it everytime and truncate it.
> > > I created indexes on this permanent table too. This did improve the
> > > performance to some extent.
> > >
> > > Does using permanant tables also bloat the catalog or hinder the
> performance?
> > >
> >
> > In terms of catalog usage, permanent tables behave exactly the same as
> > temp tables.
> >
>
> True, but the point is that you're not bloating the catalogs with thousands
> of temp table entries.
>
> I agree with others though: it certainly doesn't sound like there's any
> reason to be using temp tables here at all. This sounds like a case of
> trying to apply procedural programming techniques to a database instead of
> using set theory (which generally doesn't work well).
> --
> Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
> Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
>
>
>