| From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | samantha mahindrakar <sam(dot)mahindrakar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance with temporary table |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 02:31:54 |
| Message-ID: | 7B9D16CA-CD05-4F07-B35B-31734A91BECB@myemma.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Apr 9, 2008, at 6:41 PM, samantha mahindrakar wrote:
> Hi
> The reason for using the temporary table is that i need this data
> buffered somewhere so that i can use it for later computation. And the
> fact that for each imputation i need to have historical data from 10
> previous weeks makes it necessary to create something that can hold
> the data. However once the computation is done for each record i
> wouldn't need that historical data for that record. I Would be moving
> on to the next record and find its own historical data.
> Is there any way i can avoid using temp table?
What's wrong with the data in the paritions?
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | samantha mahindrakar | 2008-04-10 02:43:17 | Re: Performance with temporary table |
| Previous Message | samantha mahindrakar | 2008-04-09 23:41:18 | Re: Performance with temporary table |