Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems

From: geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu
To: pgsql <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems
Date: 1999-02-05 13:28:39
Message-ID: emacs-smtp-4042-14010-61959-112469@export.andrew.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Then <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> spoke up and said:
>
> > >2. gram.y did not compile by yacc (on FreeBSD too)
> > ># woland(dms)~/postgresql-6.4.2/src/backend/parser>yacc -d gram.y
> > ># yacc: f - maximum table size exceeded
> > >fixed by using bison
> > I had always used bison. I will add this to the DU FAQ.
>
> This should not be required in principle, but it is easy with cvs to
> accidentally get the time tags on gram.y and gram.c out of sync, so that
> a "cvs checkout" causes Make to think gram.c needs to be rebuilt. I
> think that v6.4.2 ended up with the times out of sync, as have other
> releases in the past.

If someone with access to CVSROOT on the CVS server would be so kind,
it's easy to set up a rule in commitinfo to automatically create
gram.c from gram.y, thus forcing a new, properly timestamped version
of gram.c to be in the archive.

--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)andrew(dot)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-05 13:51:20 Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems
Previous Message Michael Meskes 1999-02-05 12:32:03 Re: [HACKERS] DEC OSF1 Compilation problems