From: | "anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel |
Date: | 2012-10-10 23:34:58 |
Message-ID: | ede38182-732a-4647-840b-f9e639b469b0@email.android.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> schrieb:
>On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:02:26AM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> On 15 September 2012 01:39, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>wrote:
>> > (0008-Introduce-wal-decoding-via-catalog-timetravel.patch)
>>
>> This patch is the 8th of 8 in a patch series that covers different
>> aspects of the bi-directional replication feature planned for
>> PostgreSQL 9.3. For those that are unfamiliar with the BDR
>projection,
>> a useful summary is available in an e-mail sent to this list by Simon
>> Riggs back in April [1]. I should also point out that Andres has made
>
>Does this design allow replication/communcation between clusters
>running
>different major versions of Postgres?
This patchset only contains only the decoding/changeset generation part of logical replication. It provides (as in the debugging example) the capabilities to generate a correct textual format and thus can be used to build a solution with support for cross version/arch replication as long as the text format of the used types is compatible.
Does that answer the question?
Andres
---
Please excuse the brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-10-10 23:48:13 | Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-10-10 23:30:18 | Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel |