| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel |
| Date: | 2012-10-10 23:16:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20121010231606.GA11890@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:02:26AM +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 15 September 2012 01:39, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > (0008-Introduce-wal-decoding-via-catalog-timetravel.patch)
>
> This patch is the 8th of 8 in a patch series that covers different
> aspects of the bi-directional replication feature planned for
> PostgreSQL 9.3. For those that are unfamiliar with the BDR projection,
> a useful summary is available in an e-mail sent to this list by Simon
> Riggs back in April [1]. I should also point out that Andres has made
Does this design allow replication/communcation between clusters running
different major versions of Postgres?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-10-10 23:30:18 | Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-10-10 23:10:22 | Re: change in LOCK behavior |