| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wrong comment in libpq.h |
| Date: | 2024-05-06 09:48:42 |
| Message-ID: | ecf4411b-0f71-45f8-8c5e-81bb07f55e3a@eisentraut.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04.05.24 00:29, David Zhang wrote:
> On 2024-05-03 4:53 a.m., Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 3 May 2024, at 13:48, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Maybe it's easier if we just replaced
>>>
>>> prototypes for functions in xxx.c
>>>
>>> with
>>>
>>> declarations for xxx.c
>>>
>>> throughout src/include/libpq/libpq.h.
>> +1
> +1
It looks like this wording "prototypes for functions in" is used many
times in src/include/, in many cases equally inaccurately, so I would
suggest creating a more comprehensive patch for this.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-05-06 10:19:25 | Re: psql: fix variable existence tab completion |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-05-06 09:23:57 | Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency. |