From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Lars Kanis <lars(at)greiz-reinsdorf(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Fix build on MINGW on ARM64 |
Date: | 2025-04-07 15:21:29 |
Message-ID: | ecf39320-7b89-4b2a-876a-7e568c1b198b@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-04-07 Mo 11:05 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-07 Mo 12:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> On 2025-04-01 Tu 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-01 Tu 8:47 AM, vignesh C wrote:
>>>>> There is an existing CF entry for this at [1]. If no one picks this
>>>>> till the end of this CF, we can move it to next CF.
>>>>> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5610/
>>>> Somehow I missed that. OK, looks good, will commit shortly.
>>> Done
>> fairywren has been failing rather horribly since this went in [1].
>> It's not certain of course that this commit broke it and not one
>> of the other ones that first appeared in that build -- but none
>> of the other ones look plausibly related.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>> [1]
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2025-04-02%2007%3A06%3A04
>
>
>
> Yes, that was indeed the problem. I have reverted the patch.
>
>
>
Lars,
I have marked the CF entry as Returned with Feedback - you can submit
again, but will need to show that this does not cause breakage on x86_64
using any msys2 toolchain.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-07 15:27:19 | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-04-07 15:11:11 | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |