| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2025-04-07 15:27:19 |
| Message-ID: | 3463767.1744039639@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 6:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> 1. Ignore the inconsistency, commit 0004 as-is.
>>
>> 2. Change the output to be an empty string in background processes.
>> This is consistent, but it goes against our upthread feeling that
>> "[none]" would avoid confusion.
> I lean for #1. Yes, there is some inconsistency, but it feels like the
> right thing to do, and this is a feature I suspect not many people will use
> anyway.
Hearing no other comments, I pushed 0004 as-is. It's trivial enough
to replace "[none]" with "" if somebody makes the case for that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-04-07 15:29:53 | Re: Periodic FSM vacuum doesn't happen in one-pass strategy vacuum. |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-04-07 15:21:29 | Re: [PATCH] Fix build on MINGW on ARM64 |