Re: postgres_fdw batching vs. (re)creating the tuple slots

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw batching vs. (re)creating the tuple slots
Date: 2021-06-09 11:08:36
Message-ID: ec1c620f-b9ff-26ac-6848-6e39f0a72f6e@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/9/21 12:50 PM, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 4:00 PM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's a v2 fixing a silly bug with reusing the same variable in two
>> nested loops (worked for simple postgres_fdw cases, but "make check"
>> failed).
>
> I applied these patches and ran make check in postgres_fdw contrib
> module, I saw a server crash. Is it the same failure you were saying
> above?
>

Nope, that was causing infinite loop. This is jut a silly mistake on my
side - I forgot to replace the i/j variable inside the loop. Here's v3.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-create-copy-of-a-descriptor-for-batching-v3.patch text/x-patch 1.5 KB
0002-initialize-slots-only-once-for-batching-v3.patch text/x-patch 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-09 11:20:38 Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2021-06-09 11:02:02 Re: speed up verifying UTF-8