Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding the extension name to EData / log_line_prefix
Date: 2024-05-15 15:34:06
Message-ID: eb1c3195-8eb6-46c0-91be-44f2a79734c6@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14.05.24 01:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> The mechanism that Andres describes for sourcing the name seems a bit
> overcomplex though. Why not just allow/require each extension to
> specify its name as a constant string? We could force the matter by
> redefining PG_MODULE_MAGIC as taking an argument:
>
> PG_MODULE_MAGIC("hstore");

We kind of already have something like this, for NLS. If you look for
pg_bindtextdomain(TEXTDOMAIN) and ereport_domain(), this information
already trickles into the vicinity of the error data. Maybe the same
thing could just be used for this, by wiring up the macros a bit
differently.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-05-15 15:46:34 Re: CREATE TABLE creates a composite type corresponding to the table row, which is and is not there
Previous Message Sriram RK 2024-05-15 15:33:25 Re: AIX support