| From: | Erikjan Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)maxipad(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Renee <renee(dot)phillips(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |
| Date: | 2019-10-02 10:57:26 |
| Message-ID: | e9a72cde5e0078307998597ce12b3ddf@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 2019-10-02 12:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a lot less
>> baggage.
>>
>> I support a search and replace.
>>
>> I think it'll take a bit more than just a simple "sed script to
>> replace", if that's what you mean. But probably not all that much --
>> but
>> there can certainly be cases where nearby langaugae also has to be
>> changed to make it work properly. But I have a hard time seeing it as
>> being a *huge* undertaking.
>
> I find this proposal to be dubious and unsubstantiated. Do we need to
> get rid of "multimaster", "postmaster"?
>
IMHO, hat would seem a bad idea. Let's not take the politicising too
far.
I would say leave it at abolishing 'slave' (as we have already done).
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2019-10-02 11:39:30 | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-10-02 10:46:34 | Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here |