Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)maxipad(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Renee <renee(dot)phillips(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here
Date: 2019-10-02 10:46:34
Message-ID: 611b57f4-be10-5e12-26ea-a2b1940d70bd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2019-10-02 10:21, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Exactly. Both might be accurate, but one comes with a lot less baggage.
>
> I support a search and replace. 
>
> I think it'll take a bit more than just a simple "sed script to
> replace", if that's what you mean. But probably not all that much -- but
> there can certainly be cases where nearby langaugae also has to be
> changed to make it work properly. But I have a hard time seeing it as
> being a *huge* undertaking.

I find this proposal to be dubious and unsubstantiated. Do we need to
get rid of "multimaster", "postmaster"?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erikjan Rijkers 2019-10-02 10:57:26 Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2019-10-02 08:21:35 Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here