Why date index is not used

From: "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Why date index is not used
Date: 2006-06-08 18:53:17
Message-ID: e69rq9$2a1b$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Why Postgres 8.1 does not use makse_kuupaev_idx index in the following query
?

How to speed this query up ?

explain analyze select * from makse order by kuupaev desc, kellaaeg desc
limit 100

"Limit (cost=62907.94..62908.19 rows=100 width=876) (actual
time=33699.551..33701.001 rows=100 loops=1)"
" -> Sort (cost=62907.94..63040.49 rows=53022 width=876) (actual
time=33699.534..33700.129 rows=100 loops=1)"
" Sort Key: kuupaev, kellaaeg"
" -> Seq Scan on makse (cost=0.00..2717.22 rows=53022 width=876)
(actual time=0.020..308.502 rows=53028 loops=1)"
"Total runtime: 37857.177 ms"

CREATE TABLE makse(
kuupaev date,
kellaaeg char(6) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''::bpchar,
guid char(36) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT makse_pkey PRIMARY KEY (guid) )

CREATE INDEX makse_kuupaev_idx ON makse USING btree (kuupaev);

Andrus.

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2006-06-08 19:10:58 Re: Why date index is not used
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2006-06-08 16:42:25 Re: JOIN with inherited table ignores indexes