Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> writes:
>
>>Any explanation for this horror?
>
>
> Existing releases aren't smart about planning joins to inheritance
> trees.
Using a view that UNIONs SELECT .. ONLY as replacement for the parent
table isn't any better. Is that improved too?
> CVS HEAD is better...
Customers like HEAD versions for production purposes :-)
Regards,
Andreas