Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2

From: "Carl Youngblood" <carl(at)youngbloods(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Date: 2006-08-15 18:47:54
Message-ID: e5ed7b690608151147o7f65132do3b9d301f8b2ebc65@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I tried setting it to 2GB and postgres wouldn't start. Didn't
investigate in much greater detail as to why it wouldn't start, but
after switching it back to 1GB it started fine.

On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> See the recent thread about how old rules of thumb for shared_buffers
> are now completely bunk. With 4G of memory, setting shared_buffers to 2G
> could easily be reasonable. The OP really needs to test several
> different values with their actual workload and see what works best.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Carl Youngblood 2006-08-15 18:49:04 Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Previous Message mark 2006-08-15 18:33:27 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and