From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Carl Youngblood <carl(at)youngbloods(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2 |
Date: | 2006-08-15 19:21:46 |
Message-ID: | 20060815192145.GI21363@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:47:54PM -0600, Carl Youngblood wrote:
> I tried setting it to 2GB and postgres wouldn't start. Didn't
> investigate in much greater detail as to why it wouldn't start, but
> after switching it back to 1GB it started fine.
Most likely because you didn't set the kernel's shared memory settings
high enough.
To answer you other question:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-08/msg00095.php
> On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> >See the recent thread about how old rules of thumb for shared_buffers
> >are now completely bunk. With 4G of memory, setting shared_buffers to 2G
> >could easily be reasonable. The OP really needs to test several
> >different values with their actual workload and see what works best.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-08-15 19:27:49 | Re: Inner Join of the same table |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2006-08-15 19:17:38 | Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance |