From: | "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Rafal Pietrak" <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>, "pgsql-general General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CREATE DATABASE |
Date: | 2006-08-03 20:44:04 |
Message-ID: | e431ff4c0608031344r453057c4v5d97da0a442eff89@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/4/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
[...]
> BTW, difference vanishes due to expression power of SQL -
> it supports session comands in the same context as DDL commands and
> data manipulation stmts (SQL:200n, 4.33.2.5 'SQL-connection
> statements').
Sorry, I already see my failure. It is in the fact that Postgres
doesn't support that connection statements yet (but some connection
things are supported - like changing the CURRENT_ROLE).
So, my previous message is interesting only from theoretical point of
view. I always try to thing in the manner of SQL standard or use
knowledge from books/university ...
But the logic is clear, isn't it? Connection is not client operation.
I think that Rafal's proposal is quite interesting (I experience the
same difficulties every time. There was several wrong DROP DATABASE in
my career... :-) )
--
Best regards,
Nikolay
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Audette | 2006-08-03 20:45:19 | Re: Well, Pervasive is now out.... |
Previous Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2006-08-03 20:40:25 | Re: Well, Pervasive is now out.... |