| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rafal Pietrak <rafal(at)zorro(dot)isa-geek(dot)com>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE DATABASE |
| Date: | 2006-08-03 22:06:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20060803145339.V81826@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [...]
> > BTW, difference vanishes due to expression power of SQL -
> > it supports session comands in the same context as DDL commands and
> > data manipulation stmts (SQL:200n, 4.33.2.5 'SQL-connection
> > statements').
>
> Sorry, I already see my failure. It is in the fact that Postgres
> doesn't support that connection statements yet (but some connection
> things are supported - like changing the CURRENT_ROLE).
>
> So, my previous message is interesting only from theoretical point of
> view. I always try to thing in the manner of SQL standard or use
> knowledge from books/university ...
>
> But the logic is clear, isn't it? Connection is not client operation.
I'd read 4.39 differently which seems to imply that the SQL-client handles
the connection statements.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2006-08-03 22:20:42 | Re: CREATE DATABASE |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-08-03 21:15:49 | Re: SAVEPOINT and FOR UPDATE |