Re: PostgreSQL committer history?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Date: 2006-03-09 05:06:10
Message-ID: e2e2171059fd4289a289ed4ac929596c@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Right. It is a case where the volume of patches just overwhelms us and
> we give them commit access. It isn't "trust", and the only downside I
> see to commit vs. non-commit users is the delay in getting things into
> CVS. The delay used to be 24-48 hours, but as my responsibilities have
> grown, the delay has grown as well. I am not sure how to fix that.

Delegate that responsibility to the others that have commit access. If
that's not enough, grant some more people commit access so they can
apply the already approved patches. And stop traveling all over the
world so much. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200603082358
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFED7ZcvJuQZxSWSsgRAoT4AKDJj2CcbMT7izuLkefLeFf0pCQ1swCfQrEj
qyOW+GInRNZaEOUDFFgaYbo=
=9Gv0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-09 05:09:25 Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-03-09 05:00:00 Re: PostgreSQL committer history?