From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Date: | 2006-03-09 05:09:25 |
Message-ID: | 200603090509.k2959PA24587@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > Right. It is a case where the volume of patches just overwhelms us and
> > we give them commit access. It isn't "trust", and the only downside I
> > see to commit vs. non-commit users is the delay in getting things into
> > CVS. The delay used to be 24-48 hours, but as my responsibilities have
> > grown, the delay has grown as well. I am not sure how to fix that.
>
> Delegate that responsibility to the others that have commit access. If
> that's not enough, grant some more people commit access so they can
> apply the already approved patches. And stop traveling all over the
> world so much. :)
The patch queues are open and committers are encourages to apply them.
Neil and Tom do it sometimes. I then remove the item and update any
TODO entries.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-03-09 05:22:58 | MySQL million tables |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-03-09 05:06:10 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |