Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date: 2010-01-21 12:26:27
Message-ID: e20fd0d1313b4f02c91b3088a0514319@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> 9.0.

> You don't have a code-name. All the cool kids have code-names
> for their projects.

I've got one: "Postgres"

Better yet, how about we bite the bullet and make the name change
official. Seems like a major version bump is the right time
to do it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001210726
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAktYR90ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjDmACfVud6mJMRDX5poG1c+Y+z4UYw
jUIAnR9+OaIHNDwT3ZhiCivMF3skGJwn
=fWzV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-01-21 12:35:47 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-01-21 10:57:35 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-01-21 12:35:47 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Previous Message Leonardo F 2010-01-21 12:00:09 Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch