| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Date: | 2010-01-21 10:57:35 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e11001210257nc9403ep4a49ba50d6e7858a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I feel sorry for 8.5 now. It had such high hopes of becoming a proper
> version.
Yeah, well - it'll be remembered. I still find occasional references
to PostgreSQL 7.5 in the pgAdmin code.
> So, does this mean the next alpha/beta will be named 9.0 too?
9.0alpha4
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2010-01-21 12:26:27 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-01-21 10:54:02 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-01-21 11:06:04 | Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-01-21 10:54:02 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |