On 09/28/2016 11:55 AM, Mithun Cy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think that this needs to be updated again for v8 of concurrent and v5
> of wal
>
> Adding the rebased patch over [1] + [2]
>
As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch
needs a rebase.
I have moved this submission to the next CF.
Thanks for working on this !
Best regards,
Jesper