| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index |
| Date: | 2016-12-01 14:42:13 |
| Message-ID: | 4e11d87a-eaf1-7700-2e0c-ea480678eafe@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/11/2016 12:11 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing this patch. I would like to update you that this
> patch has got dependency on a patch for concurrent hash index and WAL
> log in hash index. So, till these two patches for hash index are not
> stable I won't be able to share you a next version of patch for
> supporting microvacuum in hash index.
>
As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch
needs a rebase.
I have moved this submission to the next CF.
Thanks for working on this !
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | xu jian | 2016-12-01 14:45:13 | 答复: [HACKERS] postgres 1 个(共 2 个) can pg 9.6 vacuum freeze skip page on index? |
| Previous Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2016-12-01 14:40:18 | Re: Cache Hash Index meta page. |