Re: is the base backup protocol used by out-of-core tools?

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: is the base backup protocol used by out-of-core tools?
Date: 2022-02-09 13:50:58
Message-ID: e0a25240fe542c97c929e8baa62bdc63d6acdc4f.camel@oopsware.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Mittwoch, dem 09.02.2022 um 08:01 -0500 schrieb Robert Haas:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:14 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks for pining.  AFAICS, as you see, pg_rman doesn't talk
> > basebackup protocol (nor even pg_basebackup command) as it supports
> > inremental backup.  So there's no issue about the removal of old
> > syntax on our side.
>
> Cool. Since the verdict here seems pretty unanimous and we've heard
> from a good number of backup tool authors, I'll give this another day
> or so and then commit, unless objections emerge before then.
>

A while ago i worked on a tool which talks the streaming protocol
directly. In the past there were already additions to the protocol
(like MANIFEST), so to support those optional features and multiple
major versions you already have to abstract the code to deal with that.

Having said that, i don't have any objections either to remove the old
protocol support.

Thanks
Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-09 13:52:30 Re: [PATCH] Improve function toast_delete_external (src/backend/access/table/toast_helper.c)
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2022-02-09 13:41:27 Re: refactoring basebackup.c