| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: is the base backup protocol used by out-of-core tools? |
| Date: | 2022-02-09 13:01:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaRt8_4TLEfRoD4BMd+0exffrKBYUV2ytZ1AOSq5HbOLA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 3:14 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for pining. AFAICS, as you see, pg_rman doesn't talk
> basebackup protocol (nor even pg_basebackup command) as it supports
> inremental backup. So there's no issue about the removal of old
> syntax on our side.
Cool. Since the verdict here seems pretty unanimous and we've heard
from a good number of backup tool authors, I'll give this another day
or so and then commit, unless objections emerge before then.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-02-09 13:11:30 | Re: Refactoring SSL tests |
| Previous Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2022-02-09 12:20:54 | CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index |