Re: review: More frame options in window functions

From: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions
Date: 2010-01-19 20:02:16
Message-ID: e08cc0401001191202w2e706fe9q8faed1d9b2a8cc13@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/1/19 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Yeah, that's my point, too. The planner has to distinguish "four" from
> sort pathkeys and to teach the executor the simple information which
> column should be used to determine frame. I was bit wrong because some
> of current executor code isn't like it, like using ordNumCols == 0 to
> know whether partition equals to frame, though....

And here's another version to fix this problem (I hope). Now the
planner distinguish sort column from actual significant pathkeys. I
tested it on both of 32bit and 64bit Linux.

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada

Attachment Content-Type Size
more_frame_options.20100120.patch.gz application/x-gzip 24.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-01-19 20:06:06 Re: attoptions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-19 20:01:40 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier